A former CIA officer’s explosive claim that President Donald Trump attempted to activate nuclear launch codes has collapsed under scrutiny, with major news outlets finding zero evidence to support the allegation that mirrors discredited January 6 conspiracy theories.
The Unverified Allegation
Former CIA operative Larry Johnson appeared on the April 20 podcast Judging Freedom, hosted by ex-Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, claiming an emergency White House session turned confrontational when General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, allegedly refused to facilitate use of nuclear codes. Johnson described it as a major blowup between military leadership and the Commander-in-Chief. The podcast offered a single piece of evidence: video footage showing General Caine walking on White House grounds with his head down.
Investigation Reveals No Support
Newsweek conducted an independent investigation into Johnson’s claims and found absolutely no corroboration. While high-level meetings did occur on April 18 regarding the expiring Iran ceasefire, no credible news organization or government official verified that nuclear launch authority was ever invoked. The story relies entirely on speculation and circumstantial observations. Defense officials familiar with White House protocols have not confirmed any unusual nuclear command activity during the timeframe Johnson referenced.
Pattern of False Claims
The incident echoes previous debunked allegations against Trump, particularly the January 6 story claiming he attempted to commandeer the presidential limousine. That narrative, pushed by a former White House aide, was thoroughly discredited by Secret Service testimony and contemporaneous records. Both stories share common elements: dramatic claims from partisan sources, lack of corroborating evidence, and sensational scenarios designed to portray the president as dangerous or unstable. Political observers note these allegations surface regularly despite repeated failures to substantiate them.
Media Credibility at Stake
The willingness of media figures to amplify unverified claims raises serious questions about journalistic standards. Johnson’s allegation spread across social media before fact-checkers could evaluate its legitimacy. Nuclear launch protocols involve multiple layers of verification and military chain-of-command procedures that make the scenario Johnson described operationally implausible. The absence of any official military statement, congressional inquiry, or corroborating testimony from the dozens of personnel who would have witnessed such an event underscores the claim’s weakness. Trump critics have attempted similar narratives repeatedly, each collapsing upon examination.
Sources
Townhall: File This Under ‘Didn’t Happen:’ Ex-CIA Spook Alleges Trump Tried to Use the Nuclear Codes
The President is well aware of what he is doing but the liberals will come up with any scenario they can to go against him! By now you would think they would learn!!
Myself and many I know already hold the credibility of the MSM and Legacy media on a level as high as a snakes belly is off the ground. The only thing that makes sense is the the mainstream media is no longer mainstream and believes its goal now is what is called Advocacy Journalism. This is not my words but those of people now at the heads and management of so-called MainStream Media (MSM).
Infiltration of the MSM was known to be happening in the 1950’s (likely even before) The ideology being pushed was not any friendly to American values. McCarthyism was never proved wrong, but the Senator who was the standard bearer had too many negatives to properly expose what was actually happening. After all, the other side, which included the MSM of its time did counter attack and that worked well as the integrity of the media back then was a considerable force. Today, that is all but gone like a bad wind with a new brand working hard to move in on it all.