Rosie O’Donnell’s outrageous claim that Trump has “pawns” on the Supreme Court who could strip her citizenship reveals the left’s desperate fear-mongering about our nation’s highest court.

O’Donnell’s Baseless Supreme Court Attack

In a recent interview with “60 Minutes Australia,” Rosie O’Donnell launched an unfounded assault on the Supreme Court’s integrity. She claimed Trump has “pawns” on the nation’s highest court who might help him revoke her citizenship. This reckless rhetoric undermines public trust in our judicial system without any evidence of improper influence. O’Donnell’s conspiracy theories reflect the left’s ongoing campaign to delegitimize conservative justices who uphold constitutional principles rather than progressive ideology.

Trump’s Citizenship Threat Sparks Constitutional Debate

Trump posted on Truth Social that he was “giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship,” calling O’Donnell a “Threat to Humanity” who should remain in Ireland. While Trump’s frustration with O’Donnell’s years of vicious attacks is understandable, legal experts confirm this threat lacks constitutional foundation. The 1967 Supreme Court ruling in Afroyim v. Rusk established that native-born Americans cannot have their citizenship revoked under the Fourteenth Amendment, regardless of presidential preferences or court composition.

Decades-Long Feud Reaches New Low

The O’Donnell-Trump conflict spans decades, marked by personal insults and political disagreements that escalated during Trump’s presidency. O’Donnell moved to Ireland in January 2017 immediately after Trump’s inauguration, demonstrating her inability to accept democratic election results. Her continued attacks from abroad while living in self-imposed exile show how Trump Derangement Syndrome drove her to abandon America rather than respect our constitutional process.

O’Donnell’s latest media appearances represent another attempt to stay relevant by attacking Trump and our Supreme Court. Her inflammatory rhetoric about judicial “pawns” serves only to further divide Americans and undermine confidence in constitutional institutions. This episode highlights how celebrity critics use hyperbolic claims about threats to democracy while simultaneously attacking the very democratic institutions that protect their rights to speak freely.

Constitutional Protections Remain Ironclad

Despite O’Donnell’s fear-mongering about Supreme Court bias, constitutional law remains clear and unchanged. The Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship protections have withstood decades of legal challenges and interpretations. Constitutional scholars across the political spectrum agree that revoking native-born citizenship is legally impossible, regardless of political pressure or personal animosity. O’Donnell’s concerns about judicial manipulation reflect progressive paranoia rather than legitimate constitutional analysis rooted in legal precedent.

This manufactured controversy ultimately reveals more about O’Donnell’s desperation for attention than any real threat to constitutional rights. Her baseless attacks on Supreme Court integrity damage public discourse while providing no substantive contribution to legitimate debates about executive authority or judicial independence.

Sources:

Rosie O’Donnell claims Trump’s ‘pawns’ on Supreme Court could strip her citizenship

Trump’s Threat to Revoke Rosie O’Donnell’s U.S. Citizenship