In a shocking revelation, a leftist media outlet boasts about paying witches to curse conservative icon Charlie Kirk just days before his untimely death.

Jezebel’s Controversial Article

On September 8, 2025, Jezebel published an article detailing how they paid individuals on Etsy, who identified as witches, to cast curses on Charlie Kirk. The piece was presented in a satirical fashion, consistent with Jezebel’s editorial approach, aiming to critique political polarization. However, the timing of the article’s publication, just days before the conservative commentator’s death, escalated it into a point of contention. Critics question the appropriateness and ethics of such content in today’s highly charged media landscape.

The article’s provocative angle involved using real-world “witches” from Etsy as a narrative device. This approach not only sparked controversy but also required a subsequent editorial note from Jezebel. Following Kirk’s death, the media outlet added a note condemning the shooting and reaffirming their opposition to political violence. This move, however, did little to quell the backlash from conservative circles, who viewed the article as an attack on a prominent right-wing figure.

Media Ethics Under Scrutiny

The timing of Jezebel’s article has drawn significant criticism and scrutiny, with many accusing the outlet of irresponsibility. In a media environment where the line between satire and reality often blurs, the use of witches as a motif to mock a political figure like Kirk has raised ethical questions. Media ethicists warn about the risks of satire intersecting with real-world violence, especially when the timing of such content could be perceived as insensitive or inflammatory.

Despite Jezebel’s editorial note distancing itself from endorsing violence, the damage to its reputation among conservative audiences might be lasting. The incident has intensified partisan media criticism and highlighted the broader debate about the role of satire in political discourse. Media outlets may now find themselves reevaluating their editorial policies regarding sensitive topics and the potential repercussions of satire gone awry.

Potential Long-Term Impacts

The controversy surrounding Jezebel’s article and the tragic event of Kirk’s death could have several implications for both media and political landscapes. In the short term, there is likely to be heightened scrutiny of media ethics, particularly concerning satire and its timing relative to real-world events. In the long term, a chilling effect on satirical political commentary might emerge, with increased calls for editorial oversight and responsibility.

As the media industry grapples with these challenges, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the power dynamics and adversarial relationships that exist within media factions. Jezebel, known for its left-leaning, feminist coverage, and Charlie Kirk, a leading conservative voice, exemplify the broader political divides that fuel such controversies. The need for balance and responsibility in media practices is more crucial than ever, ensuring that the discourse remains respectful and that satire does not cross into dangerous territory.

Sources:

Jezebel Issues Editor’s Note on Article About Casting Etsy Witch Spells on Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk Assassin: Jezebel Reportedly Hired Witches to Curse MAGA Influencer Days Before Death